<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Magic Online Prototype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/</link>
	<description>Magic the Gathering Articles, Podcast, Videos, and Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>Great article. I look forward to reading more in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I look forward to reading more in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bRIAN</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8759</link>
		<dc:creator>bRIAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8759</guid>
		<description>The only way I&#039;ll ever go back to MTGO is if they offer Boxes of Boosters at competitive cardboard prices (preferably low in price, since it IS virtual).

If Wizards wants Magic Online to be EXTREMELY successful, they
&#039;ll offer booster boxes of every set they have available online.  It&#039;s really a shame that it&#039;s not available now, what were they thinking??

Until then, I&#039;ll play MWS where I can play with the cards I want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way I’ll ever go back to MTGO is if they offer Boxes of Boosters at competitive cardboard prices (preferably low in price, since it IS virtual).</p>
<p>If Wizards wants Magic Online to be EXTREMELY successful, they<br />
’ll offer booster boxes of every set they have available online.  It’s really a shame that it’s not available now, what were they thinking??</p>
<p>Until then, I’ll play MWS where I can play with the cards I want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidme</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8751</link>
		<dc:creator>davidme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8751</guid>
		<description>I thought Magic as software was amazing well done in the old version. The newest version made me quit playing for the first time since MODO has come out. I miss it and hope the next version is good enough to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Magic as software was amazing well done in the old version. The newest version made me quit playing for the first time since MODO has come out. I miss it and hope the next version is good enough to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas David Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8746</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas David Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8746</guid>
		<description>Oh such hope!  Such hope!

Yes, there are warning signs (project with estimated earliest possible release date of 14 months time, Silverlight as the technology, Nokia phones have been as bad as all the others for 5 years or more now).

But but but ... a UI expert!  Some acknowledgment that they know how bad the program currently is!  Some actual design with usability in mind!  Hope springs eternal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh such hope!  Such hope!</p>
<p>Yes, there are warning signs (project with estimated earliest possible release date of 14 months time, Silverlight as the technology, Nokia phones have been as bad as all the others for 5 years or more now).</p>
<p>But but but … a UI expert!  Some acknowledgment that they know how bad the program currently is!  Some actual design with usability in mind!  Hope springs eternal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8741</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8741</guid>
		<description>A Mac Version! Great news, been waiting for this for some time now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Mac Version! Great news, been waiting for this for some time now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8736</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8736</guid>
		<description>It looks great! The UI and bugginess of the client is really the main thing holding back magic online for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks great! The UI and bugginess of the client is really the main thing holding back magic online for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trick</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8735</link>
		<dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8735</guid>
		<description>I can totally understand your fear, but let me try to mitigate it some. There have been a number of staff changes behind the scenes which were part of the previous problems.

But they have brought in a number of new staffers who care deeply about Magic and are eager to see it succeed both on paper and online.

This prototype demo was quite reassuring as it showed that they were indeed taking it slow and determined to get it right rather than get it out the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can totally understand your fear, but let me try to mitigate it some. There have been a number of staff changes behind the scenes which were part of the previous problems.</p>
<p>But they have brought in a number of new staffers who care deeply about Magic and are eager to see it succeed both on paper and online.</p>
<p>This prototype demo was quite reassuring as it showed that they were indeed taking it slow and determined to get it right rather than get it out the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zadok001</title>
		<link>http://www.mananation.com/magic-online-prototype/comment-page-1/#comment-8734</link>
		<dc:creator>Zadok001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mananation.com/?p=996#comment-8734</guid>
		<description>Oh Noes!  Not again!

Wizards of the Coast + Software Overhaul = Unmitigated disaster.

Remember the last big shift for MTGO?  When they first started talking about it, it was going to be the Next Biggest Thing.  It was going to be fully 3D (LOLWUT?), run faster, be more stable, and feed your cat.  It was, instead, a complete boondoggle.  What the hell makes us think this will be better, or more likely to appear as advertised?

This is going to be a trainwreck.  Everything Wizards does that involves software of any kind is a trainwreck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Noes!  Not again!</p>
<p>Wizards of the Coast + Software Overhaul = Unmitigated disaster.</p>
<p>Remember the last big shift for MTGO?  When they first started talking about it, it was going to be the Next Biggest Thing.  It was going to be fully 3D (LOLWUT?), run faster, be more stable, and feed your cat.  It was, instead, a complete boondoggle.  What the hell makes us think this will be better, or more likely to appear as advertised?</p>
<p>This is going to be a trainwreck.  Everything Wizards does that involves software of any kind is a trainwreck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
